Dating apps anal sex

dating apps anal sex

Have we become a society so focused on sexual gratification and new experiences that any and everything goes? Years ago, two people started a relationship and were together for a lifetime.

Nowadays, relationships are tossed away many times over in the elusive search for something more, something magical, something lasting. I for one, cannot conceive to being that open in a relationship where I don't know that I will be spending the rest of my life with this person. There are some experiences and memories that cannot be erased. I will freely and proudly admit that I am somewhat a prude, I think my future life and health are well worth it.

I am not belittling anyone that is open to those types of activities, far from it. The current and previous trends in erotica books turned movies such as Zane and Fifty Shades of Gray, allow a safe outlet for fantasies.

Admittedly, I do become aroused by the words flying across the page and the outrageous antics of the characters in the stories. After reading several sections or the whole book, I want to roll over and try some of those things with my partner. I want to reach those amazing orgasms and feel free sexually in and out of the bed. Unfortunately, I just can't turn off the rational part of my brain. I work in a career that I come into contact with men, women and sometimes new-born babies that are now burdened with diseases that cannot be cured.

No matter what we may think, we never really know all the sexual secrets of the partners that are currently intimate with. Nor are all diseases transmitted from just traditional sex, but kissing and oral sexual contact as well. During my work, I've encountered people who have gotten yeast infections of the mouth that have spread into teeth with cavities and cause massive problems. Most parents are aware of thrush in babies, which is essentially a yeast infection.

However, in adults it goes undetected until medical problems start to arise. I guess I know too much medical information to ever let the prude out. More power to those who experience those sexual exploits, I will continue to live vicariously through books and movies.

Our Managing Editor posted a response to this article ; we recommend you give it a look! I am a single woman with an empty nest living in Atlanta. I have a professional career that I thoroughly enjoy. I am reentering the dating pool with a bit of humor and great deal of trepidation. Holy crap to stay anally themed , I cannot believe what I am reading here. I hardly know where to start commenting.

Get rid of him. Continuing on the poor decision path. What would be your motivation for doing that? Anal sex is for most more complicated than vaginal sex.

Going back a bit further a lot of women died during childbirth. They woman would often get blamed for the failed marriage and become a social pariah. Women were more often than not financially dependent and had no choice but to stay with their husbands no matter what they wanted.

My opinion is that in a lot of, if not most cases it is better to choose for your happiness. I like it much better that more people have more choices nowadays. One of the partners dying is not necessarily a criterion for a successful relationship. I have met quite a few women who like anal sex a lot. And I have met some women who either prefer it to vaginal sex or like it so much that for them having sex pretty much means also having anal sex.

What does this mean? Not all that much really. Because both our stories are anecdotal and they are coloured by a bunch of factors. More power to you for owning it. Of course you get to make decisions about your life and health. Also what type of relationship you want to be in, what you think would make you happy and what you want your sex life to be.

However everything has risks. Even a monogamous relationship, with only the pastor-seal-of-approvement-carrying missionary position sex that of course is only for reproduction and not at all for fun or pleasure has its inherent risks. An open relationship in a lot of cases might have more risks than a monogamous one. Having anal sex for some or perhaps a lot of people probably is riskier than only having vaginal sex. But life cannot be lived without risks.

You take a risk when you plan a vacation to visit Peru. You take some risk when you let a new friend in your life and home. Furthermore, previous studies mainly focused on homosexual men.

The association between using dating apps and sexual health in heterosexual people and women is poorly understood. Distinct differences in sexual practices and sexual risks between people of different genders [ 10 ] and sexual orientations [ 11 ] have been evident in previous studies. For example, men were more likely to intend to engage in sexual activities than women [ 10 ]. Oral and anal sexual intercourse was more common in homosexual men then heterosexual men. Bisexual and homosexual women were more likely to have more sexual partners than heterosexual women [ 11 ].

The lack of knowledge about the effects of using dating apps on sexual health in male and female subjects of various sexual orientations necessitated the present study. The specific objective of the present study was to explore the association between the use of smartphone dating apps and risky sexual behaviours, including the number of sexual partners with whom students have had unprotected sexual intercourse, inconsistent condom use and not using a condom the last time students had had sexual intercourse.

It was hypothesized that the use of dating apps was associated with these behaviours. This was a cross-sectional study. Subjects were recruited from four university campuses in Hong Kong by convenience sampling. Subjects were excluded if they did not speak or understand English, Cantonese or Mandarin; had already been recruited to the study; or were not college students. A coded and anonymous questionnaire was self-completed by subjects.

Questionnaires were available in English and Chinese. Bilingual field workers were present to explain the aims, procedures and nature of the study; obtain written consent; distribute and collect questionnaires; and answer questions raised by subjects. Subjects were informed that they could skip any questions they did not want to answer.

The questions about the use of dating apps, sexual behaviours and sexual orientation were adopted from previous studies [ 5 , 8 , 12 — 17 ]. Subjects were asked if they were using any smartphone dating apps[ 5 ]. Users of dating apps were asked how long they had been using them [ 5 , 16 ]. Subjects were asked if they had ever had sexual intercourse [ 15 ]. Those who had sexual intercourse experience were asked at what age they had had their first sexual intercourse[ 15 ]; the gender of their sexual partners [ 17 ]; the number of sexual partners in the past 1 month, the past 3 months and their entire lives [ 8 , 13 , 15 ]; the number of sexual partners they had had unprotected sexual intercourse with; the frequency of their condom use[ 9 ]; and whether they had used a condom the last time they had had sexual intercourse [ 15 ].

All subjects also completed a set of sociodemographic questions about age, gender, sexual orientation, relationship status, monthly income, student status, smoking habits and drinking habits. The study instrument is shown in S1 Instrument. Multicollinearity diagnostics were performed for all regression models. In each regression model, only subjects with full data were included in the analysis. Imputation or other substitution methods were not used.

The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Subjects were recruited between September and December A total of subjects completed the cross-sectional survey. Of these, subjects were included in the data analysis; the other 10 subjects were excluded because they indicated that they were not college students.

The mean age was 20 years; Demographic information is shown in Table 1. Factors associated with having sexual intercourse experience, the corresponding chi-square statistics, adjusted odds ratios aOR derived from multiple logistic regression analyses and model evaluation statistics are shown in Table 2.

All factors that were significant in the chi-square analysis remained statistically significant in the multiple logistic regression analysis except for gender and monthly income. Factors associated with having sexual intercourse experience included using dating apps aOR: Two hundred sixty subjects who had sexual intercourse experience were further analysed to explore factors associated with their sexual behaviours.

Their demographic information is shown in Table 3. The results are shown in Table 4. To further explore the association between length of time using dating apps and number of sexual partners in the last 3 months and in the last 1 month, the length of time using dating apps was put into the regression model. Subjects using dating apps for more than 12 months relative to nonusers were associated with a higher number of sexual partners in the last 3 months and last 1 month.

The results are shown in Table 5. The results of multiple logistic regression found that users of dating apps aOR: The results are shown in Table 6. Users of dating apps aOR: Moreover, female subjects were more likely to report that she or her partner did not use a condom the last time she had sexual intercourse aOR: The results are shown in Table 7.

Logistic regression analysis found that the length of time using dating apps was not a significant factor associated with risky sexual behaviours data not shown. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to examine the association between the use of dating apps and sexual health in a sample of heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual subjects. The present study found that the use of dating apps was associated with having more sexual partners, having unprotected sexual intercourse with more sexual partners, an increased likelihood of having inconsistent condom use and an increased likelihood of not having used a condom the last time the subject had sexual intercourse.

It appeared that dating apps tended to skew their users toward risky sexual encounters. More than half of the study sample used dating apps suggesting that dating apps are popular among college students.

There are at least two possible explanations. First, the nature of dating apps with their convenience, accessibility and mobility can facilitate sexual encounters [ 19 ]. Second, people who are sexually active and intend to look for sexual encounters in the first place may be drawn to dating apps to look for sexual activities. This merits further investigation to understand the causal relationship between using dating apps and the initiation of sexual intercourse.

Compared with nonusers, dating app users were more likely to have more sexual partners in their entire lives 4. This association remained after accounting for sociodemographic factors. A previous study on homosexual men also found that, compared with nonusers, app users reported significantly more sexual partners in their entire lives and in the last 3 months [ 8 ].

Another study which examined the association between sexting sending or receiving sexually explicit photos on mobile phones and sexual health in college students in the United States found that those who had engaged in sexting were more likely to have had more sexual partners in their entire lives 4. Having multiple sexual partners is problematic because numerous studies suggest that it is associated with sexually transmitted disease infection, recreational drug use, alcohol consumption, dating violence and unplanned pregnancy [ 7 , 20 — 22 ].

We also found that, compared with nonusers, those who used dating apps for more than 12 months were more likely to have more sexual partners in the last 3 months and in the last 1 month.

Conversely, there was no significant difference in the number of sexual partners in the last 3 months and the last 1 month between nonusers and those who used dating apps less than 12 months. It appeared that using dating apps can lead to an increase in the number of sexual partners.

There were several possible explanations. First, a previous qualitative study about online dating suggested that online dating websites can extend the number of people users meet and engage with sexually [ 1 ].

Dating apps, which share a similar nature with online dating websites, can provide a source of potential sexual partners. Moreover, it might expand opportunities for sexual encounters among people who are geographically isolated and among people who look for sexual partners for specific sexual practices [ 23 ]. Second, nowadays people carry their smartphones with them at all times.

Therefore, people can easily arrange casual sex by using these applications. Third, it was suggested that people were more comfortable and ready to talk about sex in an online environment [ 1 , 24 ].

The association between early sexual initiation and the number of sexual partners is consistent with that found in the United States [ 25 ] and mainland China [ 26 ] and is not unique to the population in the present study. Contrary to previous studies which found that sexual minority youths were more likely to have multiple sexual partners in their entire lives and in the last 3 months, this association cannot be found in the present study [ 7 ].

Contrary to the findings of previous studies about the use of dating apps among homosexual men [ 6 , 8 ], we found that, compared with nonusers, apps users were more likely to have had unprotected sexual intercourse with more sexual partners, inconsistent condom use and no condom use when they last had sexual intercourse. However, it is hard to compare our results with those of the previous studies due to differences in study populations, control groups, the recall period of condom use and the definition of sexual intercourse.

Subjects of the previous studies were all homosexual. Studies by Grosskopf et al and Lee et al compared the pattern of condom use between app users and subjects who used the Internet not dating apps for dating [ 6 , 9 ]. It was possible that both groups had similar sexual practices, leading to no difference in the pattern of condom use. The recall period of condom use in the previous studies was the last 3 months [ 6 , 8 , 16 ].

The previous studies only assessed unprotected anal intercourse whereas the present study examined condom use in anal, oral and virginal intercourse. Even though the risk of HIV transmission through oral sex is much lower than anal or vaginal sex, other viral and nonviral sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhoea, herpes and syphilis can be transmitted through oral sex [ 27 , 28 ]. Conversely, it was found that college students in the US who engaged in sexting were more like to have had more total unprotected vaginal and anal sex acts in the last 3 months than those who did not 7.

Several studies on homosexual men also suggested that seeking sexual partners online was associated with inconsistent condom use and unprotected anal intercourse [ 30 , 31 ]. First, given the popularity of dating apps and smartphones nowadays, it is impractical and unrealistic to stop people using dating apps. If using dating app causes more risky sexual behaviours, clinicians should develop interventions to promote the safe use of dating apps in order to reduce the likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behaviours among app users, especially for those with no history of risky sexual behaviours.

Second, we found that using dating apps was associated with more risk sexual behaviours. Therefore, users of dating apps should be targeted in risk assessment, screening as well as risk stratification. Third, the developers of these dating apps should take social responsibility. Educational elements such as popup preventive messages and notification to promote safe sex practices should be incorporated into the apps [ 32 ].

Besides, school-based interventions to promote safe sex and availability of condoms in school campuses and dormitories should be advocated. There were a number of limitations to this study. First, subjects of this study were recruited in universities by convenience sampling and thus the study findings might not be generalizable to other populations. Compared with the general populations, the age range of our study subjects were narrow and the differences in socio-demographic factors between subjects were low.

However, we used multicenter survey to expand the diversities of participants from different geographic locations, study disciplines, academic performance and socioeconomic status. To establish a robust association between the use of dating apps and sexual health, people in general population should be recruited by probability sampling in future studies.

Second, all outcomes were self-reported, which might have bias. However, using self-report measures to obtain data is a common and practical methodology in studies of behavioural health.

To strengthen the validity and reliability of our data, all the questions were adapted from previous research studies. In addition, to avoid social desirability bias, the questionnaire was anonymous and self-completed by interviewees themselves. Third, this cross-sectional study only provided clues regarding associations, and longitudinal studies are needed to establish any causal relationship between independent variables and sexual health.

However, we did not have such variables in this present study. Fourth, we combined homosexual group with bisexual group in data analysis in order to improve the model fit of the regression models. Further study should recruit more people in each group and conduct subgroup analysis to explore whether there are differences in sexual risk behaviours between heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual people.

Fifth, nowadays, smartphone apps are versatile. Some messenger apps also have a function for making new friends nearby. However, these apps which are not primarily for dating were not considered in the present study. Further studies might include this kind of apps to see if there are any impacts on sexual risk behaviours. The present study found a robust association between using dating apps and sexual risk behaviours including having more sexual partners, having had unprotected sexual intercourse with more sexual partners in a lifetime, inconsistent condom use in a lifetime and no condom use the last time subjects had sexual intercourse in our sample of college students, suggesting that app users had greater sexual risks.

With the growing popularity of using smartphone dating apps, it is time to consider development and testing of novel interventions that can target app users so that they can stay safe when seeking sexual partners through dating apps.

Further studies should also be conducted to understand the motivations for using dating apps and attempt to reveal mechanisms that may explain the relationship between using dating apps and the associated sexual risks.

National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Published online Nov 9.

... Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to examine the association between the use of dating apps and sexual health in a sample of heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual subjects. Must be 18 or older to register. Medical, Psychosocial, and Public Health Responses: A critical review of 15years of research.

: Dating apps anal sex

Dating apps anal sex 820
Dating apps anal sex 419
CRAIGSLIST ENCOUNTERS ADULT PERSONAL ADS QUEENSLAND To strengthen the validity and reliability of our data, all the questions were adapted open adult directory the newspaper previous research studies. Studies have shown that when it comes to casual sex, there is no method more successful than adult dating sites. The results are shown in Table 6. A review article concluded that online sex seeking was associated with adverse sexual health such as sexually transmitted infections STIsunsafe sex and unplanned pregnancies in both heterosexual and homosexual populations, hence, it was suggested that people who seek sexual partners on the Internet tend to be more sexually active and more willing to take risks [ 4 ]. During my work, I've encountered people who have gotten yeast infections of the mouth that have spread into teeth with cavities and cause massive problems. Factors associated with having sexual intercourse experience, the corresponding chi-square statistics, adjusted odds ratios aOR derived from multiple logistic regression analyses and model evaluation statistics are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Correlates of having sexual intercourse experience.
BABES FREE SEX SITES PERTH 801
Dating apps anal sex

Adult massage best site for casual dating

SOCIAL ESCORTS LOOKING FOR A FUCK

Table 1 Demographic information of participants. But there's good news: Also for sex and relationships. Having anal sex for some or perhaps a lot of people probably is riskier than only having vaginal sex. Subjects were informed that they could skip any questions they did not want to answer. During my work, I've encountered people who have gotten yeast infections of the mouth that have spread into teeth with cavities and cause massive problems.

© 2018 All Rights Reserved